Mahua Moitra News | No Relief For TMC's Mahua Moitra In Cash For Query Scam News | English News
to note in this YouTube video is that there is no relief for TMC’s Mahua Moitra in the cash for query scam news. The Supreme Court has refused to stay the expulsion order, denying her request to attend Parliament. The bench headed by Justice Sanjiv Kanana refused the oral request of Mahua Moitra’s council and has also received a response from the Secretary General of the Lok Sabha over her plea challenging the expulsion. The Supreme Court has posted the matter for further hearing in March. This breaking news has significant implications for Mahua Moitra, as she continues to be expelled from Parliament. In this blog post, we will discuss the details of the case and analyze the possible outcomes. Stay tuned for more updates on this ongoing matter.
– Supreme Court refuses to stay expulsion order of Mahua Moitra
The Supreme Court has rejected the request for a stay on the expulsion order of Mahua Moitra, a TMC member, in the Cash for Query scam. The bench, headed by Justice Sanjiv Kanana, also denied Moitra’s oral request to attend Parliament. The Supreme Court has requested a response from the Secretary General of the Lok Sabha regarding Moitra’s plea challenging her expulsion. Although the Supreme Court has not commented on the merits of the matter, it has scheduled further hearings for March. This breaking news brings no relief for Moitra, who sought the intervention of the Supreme Court regarding her expulsion from Parliament due to the cash-for-query scandal. The extensive hearing included arguments from Abhishek Manu Singhvi, who represented Moitra, stating that she was not given the opportunity to cross-examine the private individuals who filed complaints against her. Singhvi also claimed that the opposition MPs received the report on her expulsion late, after discussions had already taken place in Parliament. The Solicitor General of India, representing the Lok Sabha Secretariat and the Secretary General of the Lok Sabha, emphasized the matter’s importance to national security and the limited scope for judicial review of parliamentary bodies. While the Secretary General has been given three weeks to respond, the Supreme Court denied the interim relief and participation of Moitra in the parliamentary proceedings during the upcoming budget session. The Supreme Court has kept all issues open for further consideration, including the judicial review and the proceedings in the Parliament of India. Therefore, at present, Moitra remains expelled from the Indian Parliament, and her participation in the proceedings is not allowed.
– Arguments presented before the Supreme Court regarding lack of opportunity for cross-examination and delayed report submission
In a recent development, the Supreme Court has refused to provide any relief to Mahua Moitra, a member of the Trinamool Congress, regarding her expulsion from Parliament in the cash-for-query scam news. During a lengthy hearing, her counsel, Mr. Abhishek Manu Singhvi, argued before the court that she was not given an opportunity to cross-examine the individuals who had filed complaints against her. He also highlighted the delayed submission of the report to the opposition MPs, which had already resulted in discussions about her expulsion. However, the Solicitor General of India, representing the Lok Sabha Secretariat, argued that this matter pertained to national security and fell within the purview of the parliamentary body, limiting the scope for judicial review. The Supreme Court has set a deadline of three weeks for the Lok Sabha Secretary General to submit a response. Although an oral request was made for interim relief allowing Moitra to participate in parliamentary proceedings, the court denied this request and no stay has been granted. Therefore, Moitra remains expelled from the Parliament of India at this time. The matter is scheduled for further hearing in March as the budget session is set to begin soon. The Supreme Court, however, refused to comment on the merits of the case during this hearing. The outcome of this legal battle remains uncertain, and we will have to wait and watch for the next course of action. Stay tuned for more updates on this issue.
– Solicitor General argues matter of national security and limited scope for judicial review
In a recent hearing before the Supreme Court, the Solicitor General argued that the matter regarding Mahua Moitra’s expulsion from Parliament is a question of national security and that there is limited scope for judicial review. Mahua Moitra had appealed to the Supreme Court to stay her expulsion order, but the court refused to do so. The court also declined Mahua Moitra’s oral request to allow her to attend Parliament at this stage. The Supreme Court has requested a response from the Secretary General of the Lok Sabha, and the matter has been scheduled for further hearing in March. This news comes as no relief for Mahua Moitra, who moved the Supreme Court in relation to her expulsion from Parliament over the cash-for-query scandal. The details of the hearing show that Mahua Moitra’s counsel argued that she was not given a chance to cross-examine the private individuals who had complained against her. Additionally, she claimed that the opposition MPs were given the report on her expulsion very late, after much of the discussion had already taken place in Parliament. The Solicitor General, representing the Lok Sabha Secretariat, and the Secretary General of the Lok Sabha, argued that this matter falls under national security and that there is limited scope for judicial review. They also opposed the issuance of a notice in this case. Although the request for interim relief, allowing Mahua Moitra to participate in parliamentary proceedings, was made, the Supreme Court denied it. Therefore, Mahua Moitra still remains expelled from the Parliament of India. The court has kept all issues open for further consideration, including the question of judicial review and how the proceedings took place in Parliament.
– Oral request for interim relief denied by Supreme Court, no stay granted
The Supreme Court has denied the oral request for interim relief made by TMC’s Mahua Moitra in the cash-for-query scam. The bench, headed by Justice Sanjiv Kanana, also refused to stay the expulsion order against her. The Supreme Court has requested a response from the Secretary General of the Lok Sabha regarding Moitra’s plea challenging her expulsion from Parliament. The top court, however, refrained from commenting on the merits of the matter and has scheduled further hearings in March. This means that there is no relief for Mahua Moitra at the moment, as she cannot attend Parliament. The opposition MPs were given the report on her expulsion very late, after half of the discussions had already taken place in Parliament. The Solicitor General of India argued that this is a matter of national security and there is limited scope for judicial review of the Parliamentary body. The matter will continue to be heard in the coming months, with no stay granted by the Supreme Court.
The Way Forward
to note here is that the Supreme Court has refused to comment on the merits of the matter. The court has instead decided to post the matter for further hearing in March. This means that there is no relief for Mahua Moitra in the cash for query scam news.
During the hearing, Mahua Moitra’s counsel argued that she was not given a chance to cross-examine the individuals who had complained against her. Additionally, they claimed that the opposition MPs received the report late, after much of the discussion on her expulsion had already taken place in parliament.
On the other hand, the Solicitor General of India, representing the Lok Sabha Secretariat, argued that this is a matter of national security and there is limited scope for judicial review of parliamentary proceedings. They also opposed issuing a notice in this case.
While the Secretary General of the Lok Sabha has been asked to submit a response within three weeks, the Supreme Court has denied Mahua Moitra’s request for interim relief to participate in the parliamentary proceedings. This means that she remains expelled from the parliament of India.
The decision of the court keeps open the possibility of a judicial review in the future and raises questions about the conduct of these proceedings in the parliament. We will have to wait and see what happens next. Stay tuned for more updates on this matter.
